Paper detail

On the Relationship between Magnetic Expansion Factor and Observed Speed of the Solar Wind from Coronal Pseudostreamers

For the past 30+ years, the magnetic expansion factor ($f_s$) has been used in empirical relationships to predict solar wind speed ($v_{obs}$) at 1 AU, based on an inverse relationship between these two quantities. Coronal unipolar streamers (i.e. pseudostreamers) undergo limited field line expansion, resulting in $f_s$-dependent relationships to predict fast wind associated with these structures. However, case studies have shown that in situ observed pseudostreamer solar wind was much slower than that derived with $f_s$. To investigate this further, we conduct a statistical analysis to determine if $f_s$ and $v_{obs}$ are inversely correlated for a large sample of periods when pseudostreamer wind was observed at multiple 1 AU spacecraft (i.e. ACE, STEREO-A/B). We use the Wang-Sheeley-Arge (WSA) model driven by Air Force Data Assimilative Photospheric Flux Transport (ADAPT) photospheric field maps to identify 38 periods when spacecraft observe pseudostreamer wind. We compare the expansion factor of the last open field lines on either side of a pseudostreamer cusp with the corresponding in situ measured solar wind speed. We find only slow wind ($v_{obs}$ $<$ 500 km/s) is associated with pseudostreamers, and that there is not a significant correlation between $f_s$ and $v_{obs}$ for these field lines. This suggests that field lines near the open-closed boundary of pseudostreamers are not subject to the steady-state acceleration along continuously open flux tubes assumed in the $f_s$-$v_{obs}$ relationship. In general, dynamics at the boundary between open and closed field lines such as interchange reconnection will invalidate the steady-state assumptions of this relationship.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.