Paper detail

On the relations between two construction methods for conserved currents of differential equations

The relations between two construction methods (called multiplier and embedding methods) for conserved currents of general systems of ordinary or partial differential equations (DEs) are investigated. Recent studies indicate that the multiplier method, which is a generalization of Noether's theorem, has significant advantages in comparison with the embedding method, which uses adjoint-symmetry/symmetry pairs and is based on embedding the original system of DEs in a larger one that follows from a Lagrangian. In particular, the multiplier method can generally give a wider range of conserved currents than the embedding method. In this paper simple extended forms of general systems of DEs, obtained by treating parameters present in the equations or introduced into them as dependent variables, are studied. A variant of a fundamental result on the connection between the embedding method and the action of symmetries on conserved currents that correspond to a multiplier is derived for the extended systems of DEs. Using this connection and by considering particular extensions that endow the extended DEs with scaling symmetry, it is shown that the embedding method becomes significantly stronger if it is also allowed to be applied to the extended forms of the original DEs. It is also shown that up to equivalence the multipliers of an extended DE system contain the parametric multipliers of the original system together with the derivatives of the corresponding conserved currents with respect to the parameters.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.