Paper detail

On the relation between Migdal effect and dark matter-electron scattering in isolated atoms and semiconductors

A key strategy for the direct detection of sub-GeV dark matter is to search for small ionization signals. These can arise from dark matter-electron scattering or when the dark matter-nucleus scattering process is accompanied by a "Migdal" electron. We show that the theoretical descriptions of both processes are closely related, which allows for a principal mapping between dark matter-electron and dark matter-nucleus scattering rates once the dark matter interactions with matter are specified. We explore this parametric relationship for noble-liquid targets and, for the first time, provide an estimate of the "Migdal" ionization rate in semiconductors that is based on evaluating a crystal form factor that accounts for the semiconductor band structure. We also present new dark-matter-nucleus scattering limits down to dark matter masses of 500 keV using published data from XENON10, XENON100, and a SENSEI prototype Skipper-CCD. For a dark photon mediator, the dark matter-electron scattering rates dominate over the Migdal rates for dark matter masses below 100 MeV. We also provide projections for proposed experiments with xenon and silicon targets.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.