Paper detail

On the relation between EEG microstates and cross-spectra

Brain function as measured by multichannel EEG recordings can be described to a high level of accuracy by microstates, characterized as a sequence of time intervals within which the sign invariant normalized scalp electric potential field remains quasi-stable, concatenated by fast transitions. Filtering the EEG has a small effect on the spatial microstate scalp maps, but a large effect on the dynamics (e.g. duration, frequency of occurrence, and transition rates). In addition, spectral power has been found to be strongly correlated with microstate dynamics. And yet, the nature of the relation between spectra and microstates remains poorly understood. Here we show that the multivariate EEG cross-spectrum contains sufficient generative information for estimating the microstate scalp maps and their dynamics, demonstrating an underlying fundamental link between the microstate model and the multivariate cross-spectrum. Empirically, based on EEG recordings from 203 participants in eyes-closed resting state, their cross-spectral matrices were computed, from which stochastic EEG was generated. No significant differences were found for the microstate model (maps and dynamics) estimated from the actual EEG and from the stochastic EEG based solely on the cross-spectra. In addition, with the aim of quantifying the spatio-cross-spectral properties of the microstate model, we introduce here the topographic likelihood spectrum, based on the Watson distribution, which provides a frequency-by-frequency account of the contribution of a normalized microstate map to the normalized EEG cross-spectrum, independent of power. The topographic likelihood spectra are distinct for the different microstate maps. In a comparison between eyes-closed and eyes open conditions, they are shown to be significantly different in frequency specific patterns.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.