Paper detail

On the Redshift Distribution of Gamma Ray Bursts in the Swift Era

A simple physical model for long-duration gamma ray bursts (GRBs) is used to fit the redshift (z) and the jet opening-angle distributions measured with earlier GRB missions and with Swift. The effect of different sensitivities for GRB triggering is sufficient to explain the difference in the z distributions of the pre-Swift and Swift samples, with mean redshifts of <z> ~1.5 and <z>~2.7, respectively. Assuming that the emission properties of GRBs do not change with time, we find that the data can only be fitted if the comoving rate-density of GRB sources exhibits positive evolution to z >~ 3-5. The mean intrinsic beaming factor of GRBs is found to range from ~34-42, with the Swift average opening half-angle <θ_j> ~10 degree, compared to the pre-Swift average of <θ_j> ~7 degree. Within the uniform jet model, the GRB luminosity function is proportional to L^{-3.25}_*, as inferred from our best fit to the opening angle distribution. Because of the unlikely detection of several GRBs with z <~ 0.25, our analysis indicates that low redshift GRBs represent a different population of GRBs than those detected at higher redshifts. Neglecting possible metallicity effects on GRB host galaxies, we find that ~1 GRB occurs every 600,000 yrs in a local L_* spiral galaxy like the Milky Way. The fraction of high-redshift GRBs is estimated at 8-12% and 2.5-6% at z >= 5 and z >= 7, respectively, assuming continued positive evolution of the GRB rate density to high redshifts.

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.