Paper detail

On the Recovery of the Star Formation History of the LMC from the VISTA Survey of the Magellanic System

The VISTA near infrared survey of the Magellanic System (VMC) will provide deep YJKs photometry reaching stars in the oldest turn-off point all over the Magellanic Clouds (MCs). As part of the preparation for the survey, we aim to access the accuracy in the Star Formation History (SFH) that can be expected from VMC data, in particular for the LMC. To this aim, we first simulate VMC images containing not only the LMC stellar populations but also the foreground MW stars and background galaxies. We perform aperture photometry over these simulated images, access the expected levels of photometric errors and incompleteness, and apply the classical technique of SFH-recovery based on the reconstruction of colour-magnitude diagrams (CMD) via the minimization of a chi-squared-like statistics. We then evaluate the expected errors in the recovered star formation rate as a function of stellar age, SFR(t), starting from models with a known Age--Metallicity Relation (AMR). It turns out that, for a given sky area, the random errors for ages older than ~0.4 Gyr seem to be independent of the crowding. For a spatial resolution of ~0.1 sqdeg, the random errors in SFR(t) will be below 20% for this wide range of ages. On the other hand, due to the smaller stellar statistics for stars younger than ~0.4 Gyr, the outer LMC regions will require larger areas to achieve the same level of accuracy in the SFR(t). If we consider the AMR as unknown, the SFH-recovery algorithm is able to accurately recover the input AMR, at the price of an increase of random errors in the SFR(t) by a factor of about 2.5. Experiments of SFH-recovery performed for varying distance modulus and reddening indicate that the propagation of the errors in these parameters in the SFR(t) implies systematic errors below 30%.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.