On the real linear polarization constant problem

preprint2006arXivOpen access

Abstract

The present paper deals with lower bounds for the norm of products of linear forms. It has been proved by J. Arias-de-Reyna \cite{ARIAS}, that %for Cn{\mathbb C}^n, the so-called nthn^{\rm th} linear polarization constant cn(Cn)c_n({\mathbb C}^n) is nn/2n^{n/2}, for arbitrary $n\in\NN$. The same value for cn(Rn)c_n({\mathbb R}^n) is only conjectured. In a recent work A. Pappas and S. R{é}v{é}sz prove that cn(Rn)=nn/2c_n({\mathbb R}^n)=n^{n/2} for n≤5n \le 5. Moreover, they show that if the linear forms are given as fj(x)=<x,aj>f_j(x)=< x,a_j>, for some unit vectors aja_j (1≤j≤n)(1\leq j\leq n), then the product of the fjf_j's attains at least the value n−n/2n^{-n/2} at the normalized signed sum of the vectors {aj}j=1n\{a_j\}_{j=1}^{n} having maximal length. Thus they asked whether this phenomenon remains true for arbitrary n∈Nn\in{\mathbb N}. We show that for vector systems {aj}j=1n\{a_j\}_{j=1}^{n} close to an orthonormal system, the Pappas-R{é}v{é}sz estimate does hold true. Furthermore, among these vector systems the only system giving n−n/2n^{-n/2} as the norm of the product is the orthonormal system. On the other hand, for arbitrary vector systems we answer the question of A. Pappas and S. R{é}v{é}sz in the negative when n∈Nn\in {\mathbb N} is large enough. We also discuss various further examples and counterexamples that may be instructive for further research towards the determination of $c_n(\RR^n)$.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.