Paper detail

On the Rates of Convergence in Learning of Optimal Temporally Fair Schedulers

Multi-user schedulers are designed to achieve optimal average system utility (e.g. throughput) subject to a set of fairness criteria. In this work, scheduling under temporal fairness constraints is considered. Prior works have shown that a class of scheduling strategies called threshold based strategies (TBSs) achieve optimal system utility under temporal fairness constraints. The optimal TBS thresholds are determined as a function of the channel statistics. In order to provide performance guarantees for TBSs in practical scenarios --- where the scheduler learns the optimal thresholds based on the empirical observations of the channel realizations --- it is necessary to evaluate the rates of convergence of TBS thresholds to the optimal value. In this work, these rates of convergence and the effect on the resulting system utility are investigated. It is shown that the best estimate of the threshold vector is at least $ω(\frac{1}{\sqrt{t}})$ away from the optimal value, where $t$ is the number of observations of the independent and identically distributed channel realizations. Furthermore, it is shown that under long-term fairness constraints, the scheduler may achieve an average utility that is higher than the optimal long-term utility by violating the fairness criteria for a long initial period. Consequently, the resulting system utility may converge to its optimal long-term value from above. The results are verified by providing simulations of practical scheduling scenarios.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.