Paper detail

On the Rate of Convergence of Mean-Field Models: Stein's Method Meets the Perturbation Theory

This paper studies the rate of convergence of a family of continuous-time Markov chains (CTMC) to a mean-field model. When the mean-field model is a finite-dimensional dynamical system with a unique equilibrium point, an analysis based on Stein's method and the perturbation theory shows that under some mild conditions, the stationary distributions of CTMCs converge (in the mean-square sense) to the equilibrium point of the mean-field model if the mean-field model is globally asymptotically stable and locally exponentially stable. In particular, the mean square difference between the $M$th CTMC in the steady state and the equilibrium point of the mean-field system is $O(1/M),$ where $M$ is the size of the $M$th CTMC. This approach based on Stein's method provides a new framework for studying the convergence of CTMCs to their mean-field limit by mainly looking into the stability of the mean-field model, which is a deterministic system and is often easier to analyze than the CTMCs. More importantly, this approach quantifies the rate of convergence, which reveals the approximation error of using mean-field models for approximating finite-size systems.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.