Paper detail

On the Rank, Kernel, and Core of Sparse Random Graphs

We study the rank of the adjacency matrix $A$ of a random Erdos Renyi graph $G\sim \mathbb{G}(n,p)$. It is well known that when $p = (\log(n) - ω(1))/n$, with high probability, $A$ is singular. We prove that when $p = ω(1/n)$, with high probability, the corank of $A$ is equal to the number of isolated vertices remaining in $G$ after the Karp-Sipser leaf-removal process, which removes vertices of degree one and their unique neighbor. We prove a similar result for the random matrix $B$, where all entries are independent Bernoulli random variables with parameter $p$. Namely, we show that if $H$ is the bipartite graph with bi-adjacency matrix $B$, then the corank of $B$ is with high probability equal to the max of the number of left isolated vertices and the number of right isolated vertices remaining after the Karp-Sipser leaf-removal process on $H$. Additionally, we show that with high probability, the $k$-core of $\mathbb{G}(n, p)$ is full rank for any $k \geq 3$ and $p = ω(1/n)$. This partially resolves a conjecture of Van Vu for $p = ω(1/n)$. Finally, we give an application of the techniques in this paper to gradient coding, a problem in distributed computing.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.