Paper detail

On the Randomization of Frolov's Algorithm for Multivariate Integration

We are concerned with the numerical integration of functions from the Sobolev space $H^{r,\text{mix}}([0,1]^d)$ of dominating mixed smoothness $r\in\mathbb{N}$ over the $d$-dimensional unit cube. In 1976, K. K. Frolov introduced a deterministic quadrature rule whose worst case error has the order $n^{-r} \, (\log n)^{(d-1)/2}$ with respect to the number $n$ of function evaluations. This is known to be optimal. 39 years later, Erich Novak and me introduced a randomized version of this algorithm using $d$ random dilations. We showed that its error is bounded above by a constant multiple of $n^{-r-1/2} \, (\log n)^{(d-1)/2}$ in expectation and by $n^{-r} \, (\log n)^{(d-1)/2}$ almost surely. The main term $n^{-r-1/2}$ is again optimal and it turns out that the very same algorithm is also optimal for the isotropic Sobolev space $H^s([0,1]^d)$ of smoothness $s>d/2$. We also added a random shift to this algorithm to make it unbiased. Just recently, Mario Ullrich proved that the expected error of the resulting algorithm on $H^{r,\text{mix}}([0,1]^d)$ is even bounded above by $n^{-r-1/2}$. This thesis is a review of the mentioned upper bounds and their proofs.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.