Paper detail

On the radiative efficiencies, Eddington ratios, and duty cycles of luminous high-redshift quasars

We investigate the characteristic radiative efficiency ε, Eddington ratio λ, and duty cycle P_0 of high-redshift active galactic nuclei (AGN), drawing on measurements of the AGN luminosity function at z=3-6 and, especially, on recent measurements of quasar clustering at z=3-4.5 from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. The free parameters of our models are ε, λ, and the normalization, scatter, and redshift evolution of the relation between black hole mass \mbh and halo virial velocity V_vir. We compute the luminosity function from the implied growth of the black hole mass function and the quasar correlation length from the bias of the host halos. We test our adopted formulae for the halo mass function and halo bias against measurements from the large N-body simulation developed by the MICE collaboration. The strong clustering of AGNs observed at z=3 and, especially, at z=4 implies that massive black holes reside in rare, massive dark matter halos. Reproducing the observed luminosity function then requires high efficiency εand/or low Eddington ratio λ, with a lower limit (based on 2σagreement with the measured z=4 correlation length) ε> 0.7λ/(1+0.7λ), implying ε> 0.17 for λ> 0.25. Successful models predict high duty cycles, P_0~0.2, 0.5, and 0.9 at z=3.1, 4.5 and 6, respectively, and they require that the fraction of halo baryons locked in the central black hole is much larger than the locally observed value. The rapid drop in the abundance of the massive and rare host halos at z>7 implies a proportionally rapid decline in the number density of luminous quasars, much stronger than simple extrapolations of the z=3-6 luminosity function would predict. (abridged)

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.