Paper detail

On the Quantum K-Theory of the Quintic

Quantum K-theory of a smooth projective variety at genus zero is a collection of integers that can be assembled into a generating series $J(Q,q,t)$ that satisfies a system of linear differential equations with respect to $t$ and $q$-difference equations with respect to $Q$. With some mild assumptions on the variety, it is known that the full theory can be reconstructed from its small $J$-function $J(Q,q,0)$ which, in the case of Fano manifolds, is a vector-valued $q$-hypergeometric function. On the other hand, for the quintic 3-fold we formulate an explicit conjecture for the small $J$-function and its small linear $q$-difference equation expressed linearly in terms of the Gopakumar-Vafa invariants. Unlike the case of quantum knot invariants, and the case of Fano manifolds, the coefficients of the small linear $q$-difference equations are not Laurent polynomials, but rather analytic functions in two variables determined linearly by the Gopakumar-Vafa invariants of the quintic. Our conjecture for the small $J$-function agrees with a proposal of Jockers-Mayr.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.