Paper detail

On the quadratic equations for odeco tensors

Elina Robeva discovered quadratic equations satisfied by orthogonally decomposable ("odeco") tensors. Boralevi-Draisma-Horobeţ-Robeva then proved that, over the real numbers, these equations characterise odeco tensors. This raises the question to what extent they also characterise the Zariski-closure of the set of odeco tensors over the complex numbers. In the current paper we restrict ourselves to symmetric tensors of order three, i.e., of format $n \times n \times n$. By providing an explicit counterexample to one of Robeva's conjectures, we show that for $n \geq 12$, these equations do not suffice. Furthermore, in the open subset where the linear span of the slices of the tensor contains an invertible matrix, we show that Robeva's equations cut out the limits of odeco tensors for dimension $n \leq 13$, and not for $n \geq 14$ on. To this end, we show that Robeva's equations essentially capture the Gorenstein locus in the Hilbert scheme of $n$ points and we use work by Casnati-Jelisiejew-Notari on the (ir)reducibility of this locus.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.