Paper detail

On the pulse-width statistics in radio pulsars. III. Importance of the conal profile components

This work is a continuation of two previous papers of a series, in which we examined the pulse-width statistics of normal radio pulsars. In the first paper we compiled the largest ever database of pulsars with interpulses in their mean profiles. In the second one we confirmed the existence of the lower boundary in the scatter plot of core component pulse-widths versus pulsar period W50 sim 2.5 P^{-0.5}[deg], first discovered by Rankin using much smaller number of interpulse cases. In this paper we show that the same lower boundary also exists for conal profile components. Rankin proposed a very simple method of estimation of pulsar inclination angle based on comparing the width W50 of its core component with the period dependent value of the lower boundary. We claim that this method can be extended to conal components as well. To explain an existence of the lower boundary Rankin proposed that the core emission originates at or near the polar cap surface. We demonstrated clearly that no coherent pulsar radio emission can originate at altitudes lower than 10 stellar radii, irrespective of the actual mechanism of coherence. We argue that the lower boundary reflects the narrowest angular structures that can be distinguished in the average pulsar beam. These structures represent the core and the conal components in mean pulsar profiles. The P^{-0.5} dependence follows from the dipolar nature of magnetic field lines in the radio emission region, while the numerical factor of about 2.5 deg reflects the curvature radius of a non-dipolar surface magnetic field in the partially screened gap above the polar cap, where dense electron-positron plasma is created. Both core and conal emission should originate at altitudes of about 50 stellar radii in a typical pulsar, with a possibility that the core beam is emitted at a slightly lower heights than the conal ones.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.