Paper detail

On the properties of 0.11 keV to 344 MeV ion spectra in the inner heliosheath using regularized $κ$-distributions

The shape of the ion energy spectra plays a critical role toward determining the ion energetics, the acceleration mechanisms and the possible sources of different plasma and suprathermal ion populations. The determination of the exact shape of the total particle spectrum, provide the necessary means to address the inner heliosheath (IHS) dynamics. Apart from various modeling efforts, a direct fit to the measured ion spectra for an extended energy range of $\sim$0.11 to 344 MeV has not been performed to date. We use an extended set of combined 0.11-55 keV ENA measurements from the Interstellar Boundary Explorer (IBEX-Lo and IBEX-Hi) and Cassini/Ion and Neutral Camera (INCA), converted to protons, together with $\sim$28 keV to 344 MeV ion measurements from the Low Energy Charged Particle (LECP) and Cosmic Ray Subsystem (CRS) experiments on Voyager 2, over the declining phase of Solar Cyle 23 (SC23) and ascending phase Solar Cylce 24 (SC24) (2009-2016) to study the characteristics of the particle energy spectrum. We fit the 0.11 keV to 344 MeV composite spectra with a set of regularized isotropic $κ$-distribution functions (RKD) allowing the determination of the macroscopic physical properties. We demonstrate that the 2009-2012 spectrum that corresponds to the declining phase of SC23 is well fitted by three different RKDs, while the 2013-2016 spectrum, associated with the rise of SC24, can only be approximated with six different RKDs. Our results are generally consistent with shock accelerated particles that undergo additional acceleration inside the IHS. We identify a low energy transmitted population of particles, a suprathermal reflected population and a very high energy component that is modulated by GCRs. The 2013-2016 time period is most likely associated with a mixture of particles from SC23 and SC24, which is reflected by the need to employ six RDKs.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.