Paper detail

On the Problem of Local Randomness in Privacy Amplification with an Active Adversary

We study the problem of privacy amplification with an active adversary in the information theoretic setting. In this setting, two parties Alice and Bob start out with a shared $n$-bit weak random string $W$, and try to agree on a secret random key $R$ over a public channel fully controlled by an active and unbounded adversary. Typical assumptions are that these two parties have access to local private uniform random bits. In this paper we seek to minimize the requirements on the local randomness used by the two parties. We make two improvements over previous results. First, we reduce the number of random bits needed for each party to $Θ(\ell+\log n)$, where $\ell$ is the security parameter, as long as $W$ has min-entropy $n^{Ω(1)}$. Previously, the best known result needs to use $Θ((\ell+\log n)\log n)$ bits. Our result is also asymptotically optimal. Second, we generalize the problem to the case where the two parties only have local weak random sources instead of truly uniform random bits. We show that when each party has a local weak random source with min-entropy $> n/2$, there is an efficient privacy amplification protocol that works nearly as good as if the two parties have access to local uniform random bits. Next, in the case where each party only has a weak random source with arbitrarily linear min-entropy, we give an efficient privacy amplification protocol where we can achieve security parameter up to $Ω(\log k)$. Our results give the first protocols that achieve privacy amplification when each party only has access to a local weak random source.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.