Paper detail

On the preferred length scale in the anisotropy field of extragalactic IRAS sources

We investigate the existence and meaning of a preferred length in the large-scale distribution of 60-micron IRAS sources applying three tests to the 2-dimensional distribution on the celestial sphere, involving respectively the rms fluctuation and the correlation function of the source number density, and the peak number statistics. For HDM models we find a best value lambda_0 = 45-55 h^{-1} Mpc for the peak of the spectral function P(k), close to the preferred wavelength lambda = 30-40 h^{-1} Mpc of naive single-scale perturbation models. A feature should indeed be generated in this range by the anticorrelation region of xi(r), although it is not detected by recent Fourier transform analyses of redshift catalogs. Our tests provide acceptable fits for CDM models with either Omega = 0.3-0.5 or Omega = 0.1-0.2, in agreement with results in current literature. However, the quality of such fits is less satisfactory than for HDM models, with the exception of the peak number statistics, and we are not able to find a parameter interval satisfying all of our tests simultaneously. These results may indicate that the cosmic spectrum is more complicated than the smooth shapes predicted by current theoretical models.

preprint1994arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.