Paper detail

On the Precision of Full-spectrum Fitting of Simple Stellar Populations. I. Well-sampled Populations

We investigate the precision of the ages and metallicities of 21,000 mock simple stellar populations (SSPs) determined through full-spectrum fitting. The mock SSPs cover an age range of 6.8 $<$ log (age/yr) $<$ 10.2, for three wavelength ranges in the optical regime, using both Padova and MIST isochrone models. Random noise is added to the model spectra to achieve S/N ratios between 10 to 100 per wavelength pixel. We find that for S/N $\geq$ 50, this technique can yield ages of SSPs to an overall precision of $Δ\,\mbox{log(age/yr)} \sim 0.1$ for ages in the ranges 7.0 $\leq$ log (age/yr) $\leq$ 8.3 and 8.9 $\leq$ log (age/yr) $\leq$ 9.4. For the age ranges of 8.3 $\leq$ log (age/yr) $\leq$ 8.9 and log (age/yr) $\geq$ 9.5, which have significant flux contributions from asymptotic giant branch (AGB) and red giant branch (RGB) stars, respectively, the age uncertainty rises to about $\pm 0.3$ dex. The precision of age and metallicity estimation using this method depends significantly on the S/N and the wavelength range used in the fitting. We quantify the systematic differences in age predicted by the MIST and Padova isochrone models, due to their different assumptions about stellar physics in various important (i.e., luminous) phases of stellar evolution, which needs to be taken in consideration when comparing ages of star clusters obtained using these popular models. Knowing the strengths and limitations of this technique is crucial in interpreting the results obtained for real star clusters and for deciding the optimal instrument setup before performing the observations.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.