Paper detail

On the precise deviations of the characteristic polynomial of a random matrix

In this paper, using techniques developed in our earlier works on the theory of mod-Gaussian convergence, we prove precise moderate and large deviation results for the logarithm of the characteristic polynomial of a random unitary matrix. In the case where the unitary matrix is chosen according to the Haar measure, the logarithms of the probabilities of fluctuations of order $A=O(N)$ of the logarithm of the characteristic polynomial have been estimated by Hughes, Keating and O'Connell. In this work we give an equivalent of the probabilities themselves (without the logarithms), and we do so for the more general case of a matrix from the circular $β$ ensemble for any parameter $β> 0$. In comparison to previous results from Féray-Méliot-Nikeghbali (2016) and Dal Borgo-Hovhannisyan-Rouault (2019), we considerably extend the range of fluctuations for which precise estimates can be written.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.