Paper detail

On the Power of Unambiguity in Logspace

We report progress on the \NL vs \UL problem. [-] We show unconditionally that the complexity class $\ReachFewL\subseteq\UL$. This improves on the earlier known upper bound $\ReachFewL \subseteq \FewL$. [-] We investigate the complexity of min-uniqueness - a central notion in studying the \NL vs \UL problem. We show that min-uniqueness is necessary and sufficient for showing $\NL =\UL$. We revisit the class $\OptL[\log n]$ and show that {\sc ShortestPathLength} - computing the length of the shortest path in a DAG, is complete for $\OptL[\log n]$. We introduce $\UOptL[\log n]$, an unambiguous version of $\OptL[\log n]$, and show that (a) $\NL =\UL$ if and only if $\OptL[\log n] = \UOptL[\log n]$, (b) $\LogFew \leq \UOptL[\log n] \leq \SPL$. [-] We show that the reachability problem over graphs embedded on 3 pages is complete for \NL. This contrasts with the reachability problem over graphs embedded on 2 pages which is logspace equivalent to the reachability problem in planar graphs and hence is in \UL.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.