Paper detail

On the Potential of Using Sub-THz Frequencies for Beyond 5G

This paper studies the potential of using above 71GHz frequencies for 5G-Advanced or later in 6G. More specifically, the focus is to analyze what could be needed in terms of waveform and numerologies. The results suggest that higher baseline subcarrier spacings (SCSs) may be needed when moving above 71GHz, to fulfill the need for higher required bandwidths and phase noise robustness. The required SCS depends on carrier frequency and modulation order. It is also illustrated that single-carrier waveforms, especially Known Tail Discrete Fourier Transform Spread Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (KT-DFT-s-OFDM) waveform is a potential candidate to be used in 5G-Advanced or 6G for sub-THz frequencies due to its robustness to phase noise, lower output power back-off and flexible adaptation of head and tail lengths.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.