Paper detail

On The Possible Mechanism Of Energy Dissipation In Shock-Wave Fronts Driven Ahead Of Coronal Mass Ejections

Analysis of Mark 4 and LASCO C2, C3 coronagraph data shows that, at the distance $R \leq 6$ R$_\odot$ from the center of the Sun, the thickness of a CME-generated shock-wave front ($δ_F$) may be of order of the proton mean free path. This means that the energy dissipation mechanism in the shock front at these distances is collisional. A new discontinuity (thickness $δ_F^* \ll δ_F$) is observed to appear in the anterior part of the front at $R \geq 10$ R$_\odot$. Within the limits of experimental error, the thickness $δ_F^* \approx$ 0.1-0.2 R$_\odot$ does not vary with distance and is determined by the spatial resolution of the LASCO C3 instrument. At the initial stage of formation, the discontinuity on the scale of $δ_F^*$ has rather small amplitude and exists simultaneously with the front having thickness $δ_F$. The relative amplitude of the discontinuity gradually increases with distance, and the brightness profile behind it becomes even. Such transformations may be associated with the transition from a collisional shock wave to a collisionless one.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.