Paper detail

On the possible exceptions for the transcendence of the log-gamma function at rational entries

In a recent work [JNT \textbf{129}, 2154 (2009)], Gun and co-workers have claimed that the number $\,\log{Γ(x)} + \log{Γ(1-x)}\,$, $x$ being a rational number between $0$ and $1$, is transcendental with at most \emph{one} possible exception, but the proof presented there in that work is \emph{incorrect}. Here in this paper, I point out the mistake they committed and I present a theorem that establishes the transcendence of those numbers with at most \emph{two} possible exceptions. As a consequence, I make use of the reflection property of this function to establish a criteria for the transcendence of $\,\logπ$, a number whose irrationality is not proved yet. This has an interesting consequence for the transcendence of the product $\,π\cdot e$, another number whose irrationality remains unproven.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.