Abstract
In a recent work [JNT \textbf{129}, 2154 (2009)], Gun and co-workers have claimed that the number , being a rational number between and , is transcendental with at most \emph{one} possible exception, but the proof presented there in that work is \emph{incorrect}. Here in this paper, I point out the mistake they committed and I present a theorem that establishes the transcendence of those numbers with at most \emph{two} possible exceptions. As a consequence, I make use of the reflection property of this function to establish a criteria for the transcendence of , a number whose irrationality is not proved yet. This has an interesting consequence for the transcendence of the product , another number whose irrationality remains unproven.
Connections
Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.
Building this map preview
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Reviews 0
Write a review
No reviews yet.
Discussion 0
Add a comment
No comments yet.