Paper detail

On the possibility of measuring the post-Newtonian gravitoelectric correction to the orbital period of a test body in a Solar System scenario

The possibility of measuring the post-Newtonian gravitoelectric correction to the orbital period of a test particle freely orbiting a spherically symmetric mass in the Solar System is analyzed. It should be possible, in principle, to detect it for Mercury at a precision level of 10^-4. This level is mainly set by the unavoidable systematic errors due to the mismodelling in the Keplerian period which could not be reduced by accumulating a large number of orbital revolutions. Future missions like Messenger and BepiColombo should allow to improve it by increasing our knowledge of the Mercury's orbital parameters. The observational accuracy is estimated to be 10^-4 from the knowledge of the International Celestial Reference Frame (ICRF) axes. It could be improved by observing as many planetary transits as possible. It is not possible to measure such an effect in the gravitational field of the Earth by analyzing the motion of artificial satellites or the Moon because of the unavoidable systematic errors related to the uncertainties in the Keplerian periods. In the case of some recently discovered exoplanets the problems come from the observational errors which are larger than the relativistic effect.

preprint2005arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.