Paper detail

On the possibility of a warped disc origin of the inclined stellar discs at the Galactic Centre

(Abridged) The Galactic Center (GC) hosts a population of young stars some of which seem to form mutually inclined discs of clockwise and counter clockwise rotating stars. We present a warped disc origin scenario for these stars assuming that an initially flat accretion disc becomes warped due to the Pringle instability, or due to Bardeen-Petterson effect, before it fragments to stars. We show that this is plausible if the star formation efficiency $ε_{SF} \lesssim 1$, and the viscosity parameter $α\sim 0.1$. After fragmentation, we model the disc as a collection of concentric, circular, mutually tilted rings, and construct warped disc models for mass ratios and other parameters relevant to the GC environment, but also for more massive discs. We take into account the disc's self-gravity and the torques exerted by a surrounding star cluster. We show that a self-gravitating low-mass disc ($M_d / M_{bh} \sim 0.001$) precesses in integrity in the life-time of the stars, but precesses freely when the torques from a non-spherical cluster are included. An intermediate-mass disc ($M_d / M_{bh} \sim 0.01$) breaks into pieces which precess independently in the self-gravity-only case, and become disrupted in the presence of the star cluster torques. For a high-mass disc ($M_d / M_{bh} \sim 0.1$) the evolution is dominated by self-gravity and the disc is broken but not dissolved. The time-scale after which the disc breaks scales almost linearly with ($M_d / M_{bh}$) for self-gravitating models. Typical values are longer than the age of the stars for a low mass disc, and are in the range $\sim 8 \times 10^4-10^5$ yr for high and intermediate-mass discs respectively. None of these models explain the rotation properties of the two GC discs, but a comparison of them with the clockwise disc shows that the lowest mass model in a spherical star cluster matches the data best.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.