Paper detail

On the pointwise convergence of the sequence of partial Fourier Sums along lacunary subsequences

In his 2006 ICM invited address, Konyagin mentioned the following conjecture: if $S_n f$ stands for the $n$-th partial Fourier sum of $f$ and ${n_j}_j\subset \N$ is a lacunary sequence, then $S_{n_j} f$ is a.e. pointwise convergent for any $f\in L\log\log L$. In this paper we will show that $| \sup_{j} |S_{n_j}(f)| |_{1,\infty}\leq C |f|_{1} \log\log (10+\frac{|f|_{\infty}}{|f|_1})\:.$ As a direct consequence we obtain that $S_{n_j}f \rightarrow f $ a.e. for $f\in L\log\log L\log\log\log L$. The (discrete) Walsh model version of this last fact was proved by Do and Lacey but their methods do not (re)cover the (continuous) Fourier setting. The key ingredient for our proof is a tile decomposition of the operator $\sup_{j} |S_{n_j}(f)|$ which depends on both the function $f$ and on the lacunary structure of the frequencies. This tile decomposition, called $(f,ł)-$lacunary, is directly adapted to the context of our problem, and, combined with a canonical mass decomposition of the tiles, provides the natural environment to which the methods developed by the author in "On the Boundedness of the Carleson Operator near $L^1$" apply.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.