Paper detail

On the physics of cold MHD winds from oblique rotators

I show that the self-consistent solution of the problem of MHD plasma flow in magnetosphere of an oblique rotator with an initially split-monopole magnetic field is reduced to the solution of the similar problem for the axisymmetric rotator. All properties of the MHD cold plasma flows from the axisymmetric rotators with the initially split-monopole magnetic field are valid for the oblique rotators as well. Rotational losses of the oblique rotator do not depend on the inclination angle and there is no temporal evolution of this angle. Self-consistent analytical and numerical solutions for the axisymmetric plasma flows obtained earlier show that the rotators can be divided on fast rotators ($σ_0/U_0^2 > 1$) and slow rotators ($σ_0/U_0^2 < 1$), where $σ_0$ is the ratio of the Poynting flux to the matter energy flux in the flow at the equator on the surface of the star, $U_0 = γ_0v_0/c$, $v_0$ and $γ_0$ are the initial velocity and Lorentz-factor of the plasma. The self-consistent approximate analytical solution for the plasma flow from the oblique rotator is obtained under the condition $σ_0/U_0^2 \ll 1$. Implications of these results for radio pulsars are discussed. In particular, I argue that all radio pulsars are apparently the slow rotators ejecting the Poynting dominated relativistic wind.

preprint1999arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.