Paper detail

On the physical structure of IRC+10216. Ground-based and Herschel observations of CO and CCH

The C-rich AGB star IRC+10216 undergoes strong mass loss, and quasi-periodic density enhancements in the circumstellar matter have been reported. CO is ubiquitous in the CSE, while CCH emission comes from a spatially confined shell. With the IRAM 30m telescope and Herschel/HIFI, we recently detected unexpectedly strong emission from the CCH N=4-3, 6-5, 7-6, 8-7, and 9-8 transitions, challenging the available chemical and physical models. We aim to constrain the physical properties of IRC+10216's CSE, including the effect of episodic mass loss on the observed emission. In particular, we aim to determine the excitation region and conditions of CCH and to reconcile these with interferometric maps of the N=1-0 transition. Via radiative-transfer modelling, we provide a physical description of the CSE, constrained by the SED and a sample of 20 high-resolution and 29 low-resolution CO lines. We further present detailed radiative-transfer analysis of CCH. Assuming a distance of 150pc, the SED is modelled with a stellar luminosity of 11300Lsun and a dust-mass-loss rate of 4.0\times10^{-8}Msun/yr. Based on the analysis of 20 high resolution CO observations, an average gas-mass-loss rate for the last 1000yrs of 1.5\times10^{-5}Msun/yr is derived. This gives a gas-to-dust-mass ratio of 375, typical for an AGB star. The gas kinetic temperature throughout the CSE is described by 3 powerlaws: it goes as r^{-0.58} for r<9R*, as r^{-0.40} for 9<=r<=65R*, and as r^{-1.20} for r>65R*. This model successfully describes all 49 CO lines. We show the effect of wind-density enhancements on the CCH-abundance profile, and the good agreement of the model with the CCH N=1-0 transition and with the lines observed with the 30m telescope and HIFI. We report on the importance of radiative pumping to the vibrationally excited levels of CCH and the significant effect this has on the excitation of all levels of the CCH-molecule.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access20 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.