Paper detail

On the Physical Requirements for a Pre-Reionization Origin of the Unresolved Near-Infrared Background

The study of the Cosmic Near-Infrared Background (CIB) light after subtraction of resolved sources can push the limits of current observations and infer the level of galaxy and black hole activity in the early universe. However, disentangling the relative contribution from low- and high-redshift sources is not trivial. Spatial fluctuations of the CIB exhibit a clustering excess at angular scales $\sim 1^\circ$ whose origin has not been conclusively identified. We explore the likelihood that this signal is dominated by emission from galaxies and accreting black holes in the early Universe. We find that, if the first small mass galaxies have a normal IMF, the light of their ageing stars (fossils) integrated over cosmic time contributes a comparable amount to the CIB as their pre-reionization progenitors. However, the measured fluctuation signal is too large to be produced by galaxies at redshifts $z>8$ unless their star formation efficiencies are much larger than those inferred from the observed Lyman-dropout population. In order to produce the observed level of CIB fluctuation without violating constraints from galaxy counts and the electron optical depth of the IGM, minihalos at $z>12$ must form stars with efficiency $f_\star \gtrsim 0.1$ and, although a top-heavy IMF is preferred, have a very low escape fraction of ionizing radiation, $f_{\rm esc}<0.01$. If instead the CIB fluctuations are produced by high-$z$ black holes, one requires vigorous accretion in the early universe reaching $ρ_{\rm acc} \gtrsim 10^5M_\odot{\rm Mpc^{-3}}$ by $z\simeq 10$. This growth must stop by $z \sim 6$ and be significantly obscured not to overproduce the soft cosmic X-ray background (CXB) and its observed coherence with the CIB. We therefore find the range of suitable possibilities at high-$z$ to be narrow, but could possibly be widened by including additional physics and evolution at those epochs.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.