Paper detail

On the phenomenological modelling of yield surface distortion

A simple phenomenological approach to metal plasticity, including the description of the strain-induced plastic anisotropy, is considered. The advocated approach is exemplified by a two-dimensional rheological analogy. This analogy provides insight into modelling of nonlinear kinematic hardening of Armstrong-Frederick type combined with a nonlinear distortional hardening. In the previous publications of the authors, an interpolation rule between the undistorted yield surface of a virgin material and the saturated yield surface of a pre-deformed material was considered. In the current publication, a somewhat more flexible approach is considered. Given a set of convex symmetric key surfaces which correspond to different hardening stages, the form of the yield surface is smoothly interpolated between these key surfaces. Thus, any experimentally observed sequence of symmetric convex yield surfaces can be rendered. In particular, an arbitrary sharpening of the yield locus in the loading direction combined with a flattening on the opposite side can be taken into account. Moreover, the yield locus evolves smoothly and its convexity is ensured at each hardening stage.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.