Paper detail

On the performance of the variational multiscale formulation for subsurface flow and transport in heterogeneous porous media

The following work compares two popular mixed finite elements used to model subsurface flow and transport in heterogeneous porous media; the lowest order Raviart-Thomas element and the variational multiscale stabilized element. Comparison is made based on performance for several problems of engineering relevance that involve highly heterogenous material properties (permeability ratios of up to $1\times10^5$), open flow boundary conditions (pressure driven flows), and large scale domains in two dimensions. Numerical experiments are performed to show the degree to which mass conservation is violated when a flow field computed using either element is used as the advection velocity in a transport model. The results reveal that the variational multiscale element shows considerable mass production or loss for problems that involve flow tangential to layers of differing permeability, but marginal violation of local mass balance for problems of less orthogonality in the permeability. The results are useful in establishing rudimentary estimates of the error produced by using the variational mutliscale element for several different types of problems.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.