Paper detail

On the Performance of Optimized Dense Device-to-Device Wireless Networks

We consider a D2D wireless network where $n$ users are densely deployed in a squared planar region and communicate with each other without the help of a wired infrastructure. For this network, we examine the 3-phase hierarchical cooperation (HC) scheme and the 2-phase improved HC scheme based on the concept of {\em network multiple access}. Exploiting recent results on the optimality of treating interference as noise in Gaussian interference channels, we optimize the achievable average per-link rate and not just its scaling law. In addition, we provide further improvements on both the previously proposed hierarchical cooperation schemes by a more efficient use of TDMA and spatial reuse. Thanks to our explicit achievable rate expressions, we can compare HC scheme with multihop routing (MR), where the latter can be regarded as the current practice of D2D wireless networks. Our results show that the improved and optimized HC schemes yield very significant rate gains over MR in realistic conditions of channel propagation exponents, signal to noise ratio, and number of users. This sheds light on the long-standing question about the real advantage of HC scheme over MR beyond the well-known scaling laws analysis. In contrast, we also show that our rate optimization is non-trivial, since when HC is applied with off-the-shelf choice of the system parameters, no significant rate gain with respect to MR is achieved. We also show that for large pathloss exponent the sum rate is a nearly linear function of the number of users $n$ in the range of networks of practical size. This also sheds light on a long-standing dispute on the effective achievability of linear sum rate scaling with HC. Finally, we notice that the achievable sum rate for large $α$ is much larger than for small $α$. This suggests that HC scheme may be a very effective approach for networks operating at mm-waves.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.