Paper detail

On the performance of combined dichotomic predictors of natively unfolded proteins

The performance of single folding predictors and combination scores is critically evaluated. We test mean packing, mean pairwise energy and the new index gVSL2 on a dataset of 743 folded proteins and 81 natively unfolded proteins. These predictors have an individual performance comparable or even better than other proposed methods. We introduce here a strictly unanimous score S_{SU} that combines them but leaves undecided those sequences differently classified by two single predictors. The performance of the single predictors on a dataset purged from the proteins left unclassified by S_{SU}, significantly increases, indicating that unclassified proteins are mainly false predictions. Amino acid composition is the main determinant considered by these predictors, therefore unclassified proteins have a composition compatible with both folded and unfolded status. This is why purging a dataset from these ambiguous proteins increases the performance of single predictors. The percentage of proteins predicted as natively unfolded by S_{SU} in the three kingdoms are: 4.1% for Bacteria, 1.0% for Archaea and 20.0% for Eukarya; compatible with previous determinations. Evidence is given of a scaling law relating the number of natively unfolded proteins with the total number of proteins in a genome; a first estimate of the critical exponent is 1.95 +- 0.21

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.