Paper detail

On the $(p,q)$-type Strong Law of Large Numbers for Sequences of Independent Random Variables

Li, Qi, and Rosalsky (Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 2016) introduced a refinement of the Marcinkiewicz--Zygmund strong law of large numbers (SLLN), so-called the $(p,q)$-type SLLN, where $0<p<2$ and $q>0$. They obtained sets of necessary and sufficient conditions for this new type SLLN for two cases: $0<p<1$, $q>p$, and $1\le p<2,q\ge 1$. This paper gives a complete solution to open problems raised by Li, Qi, and Rosalsky by providing the necessary and sufficient conditions for the $(p,q)$-type SLLN for the cases where $0<q\le p<1$ and $0<q<1\le p<2$. We consider random variables taking values in a real separable Banach space $\mathbf{B}$, but the results are new even when $\mathbf{B}$ is the real line. Furthermore, the conditions for a sequence of random variables $\left\{X_n, n \ge 1\right\}$ satisfying the $(p, q)$-type SLLN are shown to provide an exact characterization of stable type $p$ Banach spaces.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.