Paper detail

On the origin of the fundamental metallicity relation and the scatter in galaxy scaling relations

We present a simple toy model to understand what sets the scatter in star formation and metallicity of galaxies at fixed mass. The scatter ultimately arises from the intrinsic scatter in the accretion rate, but may be substantially reduced depending on the timescale on which the accretion varies compared to the timescale on which the galaxy loses gas mass. This model naturally produces an anti-correlation between star formation and metallicity at a fixed mass, the basis of the fundamental metallicity relation. We show that observational constraints on the scatter in galaxy scaling relations can be translated into constraints on the galaxy-to-galaxy variation in the mass loading factor, and the timescales and magnitude of stochastic accretion onto star-forming galaxies. We find a remarkably small scatter in the mass loading factor, < 0.1 dex, and that the scatter in accretion rates is smaller than expected from N-body simulations.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.