Paper detail

On the origin of the CDDR violation

The investigation of any violation in the Cosmic Distance Duality Relation (CDDR) is one of the most important sources of investigation for a new physic. In this paper we propose a new method to find the origin of a possible violation on the CDDR. Such violation is defined from the equation $\frac{d_L}{d_A(1+z)^2} = η$, with $η\neq 1$. We analyze the observational constraints from SNIa, BAO and $f_{gas}$ for the parameter $η$ using three different parameterizations. We create three data sets with the following combinations: (Set I) $d_L$ data from SNIa and $d_A$ data from BAO measurements, (Set II) $d_L$ data from $f_{gas}$ and $d_A$ from BAO measurements and (Set III) $d_L$ from SNIa and $d_A$ from $f_{gas}$ measurements. The sets have 18 points and a redshift difference between the observational pairs of $Δz \leq 0.08$. It is found that the difference between Sets I and II is up to five times higher than Sets I and III, what suggest that a violation in the CDDR come from a new physics related with the angular diameter distance.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.