Paper detail

On the origin of red spirals: Does assembly bias play a role?

The formation of the red spirals is a puzzling issue in the standard picture of galaxy formation and evolution. Most studies attribute the colour of the red spirals to different environmental effects. We analyze a volume limited sample from the SDSS to study the roles of small-scale and large-scale environments on the colour of spiral galaxies. We compare the star formation rate, stellar age and stellar mass distributions of the red and blue spirals and find statistically significant differences between them at $99.9\%$ confidence level. The red spirals inhabit significantly denser regions than the blue spirals, explaining some of the observed differences in their physical properties. However, the differences persist in all types of environments, indicating that the local density alone is not sufficient to explain the origin of the red spirals. Using an information theoretic framework, we find a small but non-zero mutual information between the colour of spiral galaxies and their large-scale environment that are statistically significant ($99.9\%$ confidence level) throughout the entire length scale probed. Such correlations between the colour and the large-scale environment of spiral galaxies may result from the assembly bias. Thus both the local environment and the assembly bias may play essential roles in forming the red spirals. The spiral galaxies may have different assembly history across all types of environments. We propose a picture where the differences in the assembly history may produce spiral galaxies with different cold gas content. Such a difference would make some spirals more susceptible to quenching. In all environments, the spirals with high cold gas content could delay the quenching and maintain a blue colour, whereas the spirals with low cold gas fractions would be easily quenched and become red.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.