Paper detail

On the origin of radio-loudness in AGNs and its relationship with the properties of the central supermassive black hole

We investigate the relationship between the mass of central supermassive black holes and the radio loudness of active galactic nuclei. We use the most recent calibrations to derive virial black hole masses for samples of radio loud QSOs for which relatively small masses (M_BH<10^8 M_sun) have been estimated in the literature. We take into account the effect of radiation pressure on the BLR which reduces the effective gravitational potential experienced by the broad-line clouds and affects the mass estimates of bright quasars. We show that in well defined samples of nearby low luminosity AGNs, QSOs and AGNs from the SDSS, radio-loud (RL) AGN invariably host SMBHs exceeding ~10^8 M_sun. On the other hand, radio-quiet (RQ) AGNs are associated with a much larger range of black hole masses. The overall result still holds even without correcting the BH mass estimates for the effects of radiation pressure. We present a conjecture based on these results, which aims at explaining the origin of radio-loudness in terms of two fundamental parameters: the spin of the black hole and the black hole mass. We speculate that in order to produce a RL AGN both of the following requirements must be satisfied: 1)the black hole mass M_BH has to be larger than ~10^8 M_sun; 2)the spin of the BH must be significant, in order to satisfy theoretical requirements. Taking into account the most recent observations, we envisage a scenario in which the merger history of the host galaxy plays a fundamental role in accounting for both the properties of the AGN and the galaxy morphology, which in our picture are strictly linked. RL sources might be obtained only through major dry mergers involving BH of large mass, which would give rise to both the core morphology and the significant black hole spin needed.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.