Paper detail

On the origin of globular cluster bimodality

Globular cluster systems in most large galaxies display bimodal color and metallicity distributions, which are frequently interpreted as indicating two distinct modes of cluster formation. The metal-rich (red) and metal-poor (blue) clusters have systematically different locations and kinematics in their host galaxies. However, the red and blue clusters have similar internal properties, such as the masses, sizes, and ages. It is therefore interesting to explore whether both metal-rich and metal-poor clusters could form by a common mechanism and still be consistent with the bimodal distribution. We show that if all globular clusters form only during mergers of massive gas-rich protogalactic disks, their metallicity distribution could be statistically consistent with that of the Galactic globulars. We take galaxy assembly history from cosmological dark matter simulations and couple it with the observed scaling relations for the amount of cold gas available for star formation. In the best-fit model, early mergers of smaller hosts create exclusively blue clusters, whereas subsequent mergers of progenitor galaxies with a range of masses create both red and blue clusters. Thus bimodality arises naturally as the result of a small number of late massive merger events. We calculate the cluster mass loss, including the effects of two-body scattering and stellar evolution, and find that more blue clusters than red clusters are disrupted by the present time, because of their smaller initial masses and larger ages. The present-day mass function in the best-fit model is consistent with the Galactic distribution. However, the spatial distribution of model clusters is much more extended than observed and is independent of the parameters of our model.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.