Paper detail

On the Origin of Flux Ratio Anomaly in Quadruple Lens Systems

We explore the origin of flux ratio anomaly in quadruple lens systems. Using a semi-analytic method based on $N$-body simulations, we estimate the effect of possible magnification perturbation caused by subhaloes with a mass scale of <$\sim 10^9\,h^{-1} \textrm{M}_\odot$ in lensing galaxy haloes. Taking into account astrometric shifts, assuming that the primary lens is described by a singular isothermal ellipsoid, the expected change to the flux ratios per a multiply lensed image is just a few percent and the mean of the expected convergence perturbation at the effective Einstein radius of the lensing galaxy halo is $ 0.003$, corresponding to the mean of the ratio of a projected dark matter mass fraction in subhaloes at the effective Einstein radius $0.006$. In contrast, the expected change to the flux ratio caused by line-of-sight structures is typically $\sim 10$ percent and the mean of the convergence perturbation is $0.008$, corresponding to $0.017$. The contribution of magnification perturbation caused by subhaloes is $\sim 40$ percent of the total at a source redshift $z_S= 0.7$ and decreases monotonically in $z_S$ to $\sim 20$ percent at $z_S= 3.6$. Assuming statistical isotropy, the convergence perturbation estimated from observed 11 quadruple lens systems has a positive correlation with the source redshift $z_S$, which is much stronger than that with the lens redshift $z_L$. This feature also supports an idea that the flux ratio anomaly is caused mainly by line-of-sight structures rather than subhaloes. We also discuss about a possible imprint of line-of-sight structures in demagnification of minimum images due to locally underdense structures in the line of sight.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.