Paper detail

On the origin of core radio emissions from black hole sources in the realm of relativistic shocked accretion flow

We study the relativistic, inviscid, advective accretion flow around the black holes and investigate a key feature of the accretion flow, namely the shock waves. We observe that the shock-induced accretion solutions are prevalent and such solutions are commonly obtained for a wide range of the flow parameters, such as energy (${\cal E}$) and angular momentum ($λ$), around the black holes of spin value $0\le a_{\rm k} < 1$. When the shock is dissipative in nature, a part of the accretion energy is released through the upper and lower surfaces of the disc at the location of the shock transition. We find that the maximum accretion energies that can be extracted at the dissipative shock ($Δ{\cal E}^{\rm max}$) are $\sim 1\%$ and $\sim 4.4\%$ for Schwarzschild black holes ($a_{\rm k}\rightarrow 0$) and Kerr black holes ($a_{\rm k}\rightarrow 1$), respectively. Using $Δ{\cal E}^{\rm max}$, we compute the loss of kinetic power (equivalently shock luminosity, $L_{\rm shock}$) that is enabled to comply with the energy budget for generating jets/outflows from the jet base ($i.e.$, post-shock flow). We compare $L_{\rm shock}$ with the observed core radio luminosity ($L_R$) of black hole sources for a wide mass range spanning $10$ orders of magnitude with sub-Eddington accretion rate and perceive that the present formalism seems to be potentially viable to account $L_R$ of $16$ Galactic black hole X-ray binaries (BH-XRBs) and $2176$ active galactic nuclei (AGNs). We further aim to address the core radio luminosity of intermediate-mass black hole (IMBH) sources and indicate that the present model formalism perhaps adequate to explain core radio emission of IMBH sources in the sub-Eddington accretion limit.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.