Paper detail

On the origin and extent of mechanical variation among cells

Investigations of natural variation in cell mechanics within a cell population are essential to understand the stochastic nature of soft-network deformation. Striking commonalities have been found concerning the average values and distribution of rheological parameters of cells: first, attached and suspended cells exhibit power-law rheological behavior; second, cell stiffness is distributed log-normally. A predictive connection between these two near-universal findings has not been reported, to our knowledge. Here we postulate, based on our own and others' experimental reports and leading models of cell rheology, that the exponent that characterizes power-law rheology varies intrinsically among cells as an approximately Gaussian-distributed variable. Besides explaining naturally the log-normal distribution of cell stiffness that is widely observed, this postulate predicts multiple empirically observed relationships from cell deformation studies. Our framework ultimately links inherent noise in postulated relaxation mechanisms of cytoskeletal networks to mechanical variation among cells and cell populations.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.