Paper detail

On the Origin and Evolution of the Galaxy Stellar Mass Function

Here we explore the evolution of galaxy ensembles at early times by writing the in situ stellar mass growth of galaxies purely as a stationary stochastic (e.g., quasi-steady state) process. By combining the mathematics of such processes with Newtonian gravity and a mean local star formation efficiency, we show that the stellar mass evolution of galaxy ensembles is directly related to the average acceleration of baryons onto dark matter halos at the onset of star formation, with explicit dependencies on initial local matter densities and halo mass. The density term specifically implies more rapid average rates of growth in higher density regions of the universe compared to low density regions, i.e., assembly bias. With this framework, using standard cosmological parameters, a mean star formation efficiency derived by other authors, and knowledge of the shape of the cosmological matter power spectrum at small scales, we analytically derive (1) the characteristic stellar masses of galaxies (M*), (2) the power-law low-mass slope (alpha) and normalization (phi*) of the stellar mass function, and (3) the evolution of the stellar mass function in time over 12.5 > z > 2. Correspondingly, the rise in the cosmic star formation rate density over these epochs, while the universe can sustain unabated fueling of star formation, also emerges naturally. All of our findings are consistent with the deepest available data, including the expectation of alpha~-7/5; i.e., a stellar mass function low-mass slope that is notably shallower than that of the halo mass function, and with no systematic deviations from a mean star formation efficiency with density or mass, nor any explicit, additional feedback mechanisms. These derivations yield a compelling richness and complexity but also show that very few astrophysical details are required to understand the evolution of cosmic ensemble of galaxies at early times.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.