Paper detail

On the Optimality of Linear Index Coding over the Fields with Characteristic Three

It has been known that the insufficiency of linear coding in achieving the optimal rate of the general index coding problem is rooted in its rate's dependency on the field size. However, this dependency has been described only through the two well-known matroid instances, namely the Fano and non-Fano matroids, which, in turn, limits its scope only to the fields with characteristic two. In this paper, we extend this scope to demonstrate the reliance of linear index coding rate on fields with characteristic three. By constructing two index coding instances of size 29, we prove that for the first instance, linear coding is optimal only over the fields with characteristic three, and for the second instance, linear coding over any field with characteristic three can never be optimal. Then, a variation of the second instance is designed as the third index coding instance of size 58. For this instance, it is proved that while linear coding over any field with characteristic three cannot be optimal, there exists a nonlinear code over the fields with characteristic three, which achieves its optimal rate. Connecting the first and third index coding instances in two specific ways, called no-way and two-way connections, will lead to two new index coding instances of size 87 and 91, for which linear coding is outperformed by nonlinear codes. Another main contribution of this paper is the reduction of the key constraints on the space of the linear coding for the first and second index coding instances, each of size 29, into a matroid instance with the ground set of size 9, whose linear representability is dependent on the fields with characteristic three. The proofs and discussions provided in this paper through using these two relatively small matroid instances will shed light on the underlying reason causing the linear coding to become insufficient for the general index coding problem.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.