Paper detail

On the Optimal Scheduling of Independent, Symmetric and Time-Sensitive Tasks

Consider a discrete-time system in which a centralized controller (CC) is tasked with assigning at each time interval (or slot) K resources (or servers) to K out of M>=K nodes. When assigned a server, a node can execute a task. The tasks are independently generated at each node by stochastically symmetric and memoryless random processes and stored in a finite-capacity task queue. Moreover, they are time-sensitive in the sense that within each slot there is a non-zero probability that a task expires before being scheduled. The scheduling problem is tackled with the aim of maximizing the number of tasks completed over time (or the task-throughput) under the assumption that the CC has no direct access to the state of the task queues. The scheduling decisions at the CC are based on the outcomes of previous scheduling commands, and on the known statistical properties of the task generation and expiration processes. Based on a Markovian modeling of the task generation and expiration processes, the CC scheduling problem is formulated as a partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP) that can be cast into the framework of restless multi-armed bandit (RMAB) problems. When the task queues are of capacity one, the optimality of a myopic (or greedy) policy is proved. It is also demonstrated that the MP coincides with the Whittle index policy. For task queues of arbitrary capacity instead, the myopic policy is generally suboptimal, and its performance is compared with an upper bound obtained through a relaxation of the original problem. Overall, the settings in this paper provide a rare example where a RMAB problem can be explicitly solved, and in which the Whittle index policy is proved to be optimal.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.