Paper detail

On the Optical Light Curves of Afterglows from Jetted Gamma-ray Burst Ejecta: Effects of Parameters

Due to some refinements in the dynamics, we can follow the overall evolution of a realistic jet numerically till its bulk velocity being as small as $βc \sim 10^{-3} c$. We find no obvious break in the optical light curve during the relativistic phase itself. However, an obvious break does exist at the transition from the relativistic phase to the non-relativistic phase, which typically occurs at time $t \sim 10^6$ --- $10^{6.5}$ s (i.e., 10 --- 30 d). The break is affected by many parameters, such as the electron energy fraction $ξ_{\rm e}$, the magnetic energy fraction $ξ_{\rm B}^2$, the initial half opening angle $θ_0$, and the medium number density $n$. Increase of any of them to a large enough value will make the break disappear. Although the break itself is parameter-dependent, afterglows from jetted GRB remnants are uniformly characterized by a quick decay during the non-relativistic phase, with power law timing index $α\geq 2.1$. This is quite different from that of isotropic fireballs, and may be of fundamental importance for determining the degree of beaming in $γ$-ray bursts observationally.

preprint2000arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.