Paper detail

On the numerical stability of the least-squares method for the planar scattering by obstacles

The scattering of waves by obstacles in a 2D setting is considered, in particular the computation of the scattered field via the collocation or the least-squares methods. In the case of multiple scattering by smooth obstacles, we prove that the scattered field can be uniformly approximated by sums of multipoles. For a unique obstacle, the choice of the number of points and their positions for the estimation of the error on the border of the scatterer is studied, showing the benefit of using a non-uniform distribution of points dependent on the scatterer and the approximation scheme. In general, using a denser discretization near the singularities of the scattered field does not improve the stability of the method. The analysis can also be used to estimate the discretization size needed to ensure stability given a density of points and an approximation scheme, e.g. in the case of multiple scatterers.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.