Paper detail

On the number of radial orderings of planar point sets

Given a set $S$ of $n$ points in the plane, a \emph{radial ordering} of $S$ with respect to a point $p$ (not in $S$) is a clockwise circular ordering of the elements in $S$ by angle around $p$. If $S$ is two-colored, a \emph{colored radial ordering} is a radial ordering of $S$ in which only the colors of the points are considered. In this paper, we obtain bounds on the number of distinct non-colored and colored radial orderings of $S$. We assume a strong general position on $S$, not three points are collinear and not three lines---each passing through a pair of points in $S$---intersect in a point of $\R^2\setminus S$. In the colored case, $S$ is a set of $2n$ points partitioned into $n$ red and $n$ blue points, and $n$ is even. We prove that: the number of distinct radial orderings of $S$ is at most $O(n^4)$ and at least $Ω(n^3)$; the number of colored radial orderings of $S$ is at most $O(n^4)$ and at least $Ω(n)$; there exist sets of points with $Θ(n^4)$ colored radial orderings and sets of points with only $O(n^2)$ colored radial orderings.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.