Paper detail

On the number of incidences between points and planes in three dimensions

We prove an incidence theorem for points and planes in the projective space $\mathbb P^3$ over any field $\mathbb F$, whose characteristic $p\neq 2.$ An incidence is viewed as an intersection along a line of a pair of two-planes from two canonical rulings of the Klein quadric. The Klein quadric can be traversed by a generic hyperplane, yielding a line-line incidence problem in a three-quadric, the Klein image of a regular line complex. This hyperplane can be chosen so that at most two lines meet. Hence, one can apply an algebraic theorem of Guth and Katz, with a constraint involving $p$ if $p>0$. This yields a bound on the number of incidences between $m$ points and $n$ planes in $\mathbb P^3$, with $m\geq n$ as $$O\left(m\sqrt{n}+ m k\right),$$ where $k$ is the maximum number of collinear planes, provided that $n=O(p^2)$ if $p>0$. Examples show that this bound cannot be improved without additional assumptions. This gives one a vehicle to establish geometric incidence estimates when $p>0$. For a non-collinear point set $S\subseteq \mathbb F^2$ and a non-degenerate symmetric or skew-symmetric bilinear form $ω$, the number of distinct values of $ω$ on pairs of points of $S$ is $Ω\left[\min\left(|S|^{\frac{2}{3}},p\right)\right]$. This is also the best known bound over $\mathbb R$, where it follows from the Szemerédi-Trotter theorem. Also, a set $S\subseteq \mathbb F^3$, not supported in a single semi-isotropic plane contains a point, from which $Ω\left[\min\left(|S|^{\frac{1}{2}},p\right)\right]$ distinct distances to other points of $S$ are attained.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.